Selvakumar vs Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - MANIKANDAN D — 967/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010015152026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
1184/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
967/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
Thirumangalam Taluk P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Selvakumar
Adv. Vasanthaleela S
Lakshmanan
Adv. Vasanthaleela S
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - MANIKANDAN D
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 03-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Selvakumar (first petitioner) in a communal violence case involving charges under BNS sections 191, 296, 132, 118, 109, and 351. The court declined bail citing the serious nature of offences against law enforcement, ongoing tension in Alampatti village requiring 25 police personnel for peacekeeping, pending investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and despite many co-accused receiving bail. The petition of the second petitioner (Lakshmanan) was dismissed as not-pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Selvakumar (first petitioner) in a communal violence case involving charges under BNS sections 191, 296, 132, 118, 109, and 351. The court declined bail citing the serious nature of offences against law enforcement, ongoing tension in Alampatti village requiring 25 police personnel for peacekeeping, pending investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and despite many co-accused receiving bail. The petition of the second petitioner (Lakshmanan) was dismissed as not-pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts