Selvakumar vs Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - MANIKANDAN D — 967/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010015152026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

1184/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

967/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

Thirumangalam Taluk P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Selvakumar

Adv. Vasanthaleela S

Lakshmanan

Adv. Vasanthaleela S

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - MANIKANDAN D

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Enquiry

03-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Selvakumar (first petitioner) in a communal violence case involving charges under BNS sections 191, 296, 132, 118, 109, and 351. The court declined bail citing the serious nature of offences against law enforcement, ongoing tension in Alampatti village requiring 25 police personnel for peacekeeping, pending investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and despite many co-accused receiving bail. The petition of the second petitioner (Lakshmanan) was dismissed as not-pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Selvakumar (first petitioner) in a communal violence case involving charges under BNS sections 191, 296, 132, 118, 109, and 351. The court declined bail citing the serious nature of offences against law enforcement, ongoing tension in Alampatti village requiring 25 police personnel for peacekeeping, pending investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and despite many co-accused receiving bail. The petition of the second petitioner (Lakshmanan) was dismissed as not-pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Madurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case