Janarathan vs Othakkadai P.S. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 939/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010014682026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

1152/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

939/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

37

Police Station

Othakkadai Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Janarathan

    Adv. R. Arockia selvan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Othakkadai P.S. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of V. Janarthanan, who was accused of assaulting the complainant's wife and daughter-in-law with a wooden log, abusing them, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(3), and TNPWH Act. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of offences, the victim's month-long hospitalization requiring surgery, the petitioner's prior similar criminal case, pending investigation, and risk of absconding if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 939/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of V. Janarthanan, who was accused of assaulting the complainant's wife and daughter-in-law with a wooden log, abusing them, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(3), and TNPWH Act. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of offences, the victim's month-long hospitalization requiring surgery, the petitioner's prior similar criminal case, pending investigation, and risk of absconding if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case