Insepctor of Police Sellur PS vs Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Gounder Advocate - KASIVISWANATHAN J — 893/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010014482026

Filing Number

1139/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

893/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

Sellur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Insepctor of Police Sellur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Gounder Advocate - KASIVISWANATHAN J

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to accused Sanjay Kumar (A2) in a two-wheeler theft case under stringent conditions, noting that after 42 days in custody, further interrogation was unnecessary and bail had already been granted to co-accused A1 and A3. The petitioner must execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report to police twice daily, cooperate with investigation, and refrain from threatening witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 893/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to accused Sanjay Kumar (A2) in a two-wheeler theft case under stringent conditions, noting that after 42 days in custody, further interrogation was unnecessary and bail had already been granted to co-accused A1 and A3. The petitioner must execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report to police twice daily, cooperate with investigation, and refrain from threatening witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case