Lakshmanan vs Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 935/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010014282026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
1124/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
935/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Thirumangalam Taluk P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lakshmanan
Adv. CHANDRA SEKAR M
-
2.Balamurugan
Adv. CHANDRA SEKAR M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to two accused advocates in Criminal Case No.40/2026 (arising from a communal temple dispute in Alampatti village on 19.02.2026) on conditions including Rs.1,000 deposit each and Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, daily appearance before the magistrate, and cooperation with investigation. However, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions for the remaining 30 accused, citing the serious nature of offences (unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, property damage), ongoing communal tension requiring police picketing, and the need for custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 935/2026
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to two accused advocates in Criminal Case No.40/2026 (arising from a communal temple dispute in Alampatti village on 19.02.2026) on conditions including Rs.1,000 deposit each and Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, daily appearance before the magistrate, and cooperation with investigation. However, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions for the remaining 30 accused, citing the serious nature of offences (unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, property damage), ongoing communal tension requiring police picketing, and the need for custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts