The Inspector of Police Melavalavu P.S vs Thennarasu Advocate - RANJITHA G — 867/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010014082026

Filing Number

1107/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

867/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

193

Police Station

Melavalavu Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police Melavalavu P.S

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thennarasu Advocate - RANJITHA G

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed bail and anticipatory bail petitions filed by three accused in a dowry-harassment case involving the suicide of a young bride. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed, citing the gravity of the offense under Section 80(2) BNS, specific overt acts (assault, hair-pulling, gold chain theft), ongoing investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and the prosecution's strong objections based on the death occurring within five months of marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 867/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed bail and anticipatory bail petitions filed by three accused in a dowry-harassment case involving the suicide of a young bride. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed, citing the gravity of the offense under Section 80(2) BNS, specific overt acts (assault, hair-pulling, gold chain theft), ongoing investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and the prosecution's strong objections based on the death occurring within five months of marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case