R. Mukkaiya vs Palani Taluk P.S — 878/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010013432026
Filing Number
1050/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
878/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
361
Police Station
Palani Taluk
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Mukkaiya
Adv. MANIMARAN NA
Respondent(s)
Palani Taluk P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 07-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Madurai District and Sessions Judge dismissed the accused's petition under Section 348 BNSS seeking to recall prosecution witness PW3 for cross-examination, finding the request was merely a delaying tactic lacking valid reasons. The court held that witness recall should only be granted sparingly for strong and substantive grounds to aid in just decisions, not to fill procedural gaps caused by the accused's counsel's illness, and noted that the accused should have made alternative arrangements instead of seeking recall at the case's conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madurai District and Sessions Judge dismissed the accused's petition under Section 348 BNSS seeking to recall prosecution witness PW3 for cross-examination, finding the request was merely a delaying tactic lacking valid reasons. The court held that witness recall should only be granted sparingly for strong and substantive grounds to aid in just decisions, not to fill procedural gaps caused by the accused's counsel's illness, and noted that the accused should have made alternative arrangements instead of seeking recall at the case's conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts