R. Mukkaiya vs Palani Taluk P.S — 878/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010013432026

Filing Number

1050/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

878/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

361

Police Station

Palani Taluk

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. Mukkaiya

    Adv. MANIMARAN NA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Palani Taluk P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Madurai District and Sessions Judge dismissed the accused's petition under Section 348 BNSS seeking to recall prosecution witness PW3 for cross-examination, finding the request was merely a delaying tactic lacking valid reasons. The court held that witness recall should only be granted sparingly for strong and substantive grounds to aid in just decisions, not to fill procedural gaps caused by the accused's counsel's illness, and noted that the accused should have made alternative arrangements instead of seeking recall at the case's conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 878/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai District and Sessions Judge dismissed the accused's petition under Section 348 BNSS seeking to recall prosecution witness PW3 for cross-examination, finding the request was merely a delaying tactic lacking valid reasons. The court held that witness recall should only be granted sparingly for strong and substantive grounds to aid in just decisions, not to fill procedural gaps caused by the accused's counsel's illness, and noted that the accused should have made alternative arrangements instead of seeking recall at the case's conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case