Archunan vs Omatchikulam P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 823/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010013022026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

1016/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

823/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

Omatchikulam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Archunan

    Adv. Kasiviswanathan j Kasiviswanathan j

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Omatchikulam P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed both bail petitions filed by Mohammed Mydhin (A1) and Archunan (A4), who were accused of assaulting a Woman Head Constable on 09.02.2026. The court found the allegations serious, noting the assault on a law enforcement officer cannot be taken lightly, and considered the ongoing investigation stage and pending custodial interrogation as sufficient grounds to deny bail at that juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 823/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed both bail petitions filed by Mohammed Mydhin (A1) and Archunan (A4), who were accused of assaulting a Woman Head Constable on 09.02.2026. The court found the allegations serious, noting the assault on a law enforcement officer cannot be taken lightly, and considered the ongoing investigation stage and pending custodial interrogation as sufficient grounds to deny bail at that juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case