Thideer Nagar P.S. vs MuthuBalakrishnan — 36/2024
Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMD010008592024
Filing Number
497/2024
Filing Date
22-Jan-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
22-Jan-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
669
Police Station
Thideer Nagar Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thideer Nagar P.S.
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MuthuBalakrishnan
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 36/2024 Case: S.C. No. 36/2024, Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai Parties: Thideer Nagar P.S. (Prosecution) v. MuthuBalakrishnan (Respondent) Outcome: This document records the deposition of two prosecution witnesses (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) in a criminal case dated 02.04.2026. The witnesses testified regarding the recovery of an illegal sword from the respondent MuthuBalakrishnan on 22.11.2022 at Madurai Town. Both witnesses were cross-examined; no cross-examination questions were raised by the respondent's counsel. The case proceedings were recorded and the witnesses' testimonies were documented by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Framing of Charges
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jul-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Mar-2024
For further Proceedings
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2024
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2024
Summary of Case 36/2024 Case: S.C. No. 36/2024, Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai Parties: Thideer Nagar P.S. (Prosecution) v. MuthuBalakrishnan (Respondent) Outcome: This document records the deposition of two prosecution witnesses (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) in a criminal case dated 02.04.2026. The witnesses testified regarding the recovery of an illegal sword from the respondent MuthuBalakrishnan on 22.11.2022 at Madurai Town. Both witnesses were cross-examined; no cross-examination questions were raised by the respondent's counsel. The case proceedings were recorded and the witnesses' testimonies were documented by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts