Thideer Nagar P.S. vs MuthuBalakrishnan — 36/2024
Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMD010008592024
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
Filing Number
497/2024
Filing Date
22-01-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
22-01-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
669
Police Station
Thideer Nagar Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thideer Nagar P.S.
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
MuthuBalakrishnan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Evidence
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 02-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 13-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 36/2024 Case: S.C. No. 36/2024, Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai Parties: Thideer Nagar P.S. (Prosecution) v. MuthuBalakrishnan (Respondent) Outcome: This document records the deposition of two prosecution witnesses (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) in a criminal case dated 02.04.2026. The witnesses testified regarding the recovery of an illegal sword from the respondent MuthuBalakrishnan on 22.11.2022 at Madurai Town. Both witnesses were cross-examined; no cross-examination questions were raised by the respondent's counsel. The case proceedings were recorded and the witnesses' testimonies were documented by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 36/2024 Case: S.C. No. 36/2024, Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai Parties: Thideer Nagar P.S. (Prosecution) v. MuthuBalakrishnan (Respondent) Outcome: This document records the deposition of two prosecution witnesses (P.W. 1 and P.W. 2) in a criminal case dated 02.04.2026. The witnesses testified regarding the recovery of an illegal sword from the respondent MuthuBalakrishnan on 22.11.2022 at Madurai Town. Both witnesses were cross-examined; no cross-examination questions were raised by the respondent's counsel. The case proceedings were recorded and the witnesses' testimonies were documented by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts