M.MUTHU vs NAGARAJAN Advocate - R.SAKTHIVEL — 1/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O,7,R,1,. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR110024912023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
103/2023
Filing Date
29-11-2023
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
03-01-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.MUTHU
Adv. Y.JOHN KIRUBAGARAN
P.R.RAJESWARI
Adv. Y.JOHN KIRUBAGARAN
P.R.KAVITHA
Adv. Y.JOHN KIRUBAGARAN
P.R.RENUKA
Adv. Y.JOHN KIRUBAGARAN
Respondent(s)
NAGARAJAN Advocate - R.SAKTHIVEL
SENTHIL KUMAR
Adv. R.SAKTHIVEL
SATHISKUMAR
Adv. R.SAKTHIVEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Disposed
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 26-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 13-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram dismissed the petitioners' application for ad-interim injunction regarding disputed property divisions. The court found no prima facie case in the petitioners' favor, as neither side presented oral or documentary evidence. The court determined that the core issues—particularly regarding property SF.No:617/26 and proper documentation—require full trial proceedings with evidence before granting injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram dismissed the petitioners' application for ad-interim injunction regarding disputed property divisions. The court found no prima facie case in the petitioners' favor, as neither side presented oral or documentary evidence. The court determined that the core issues—particularly regarding property SF.No:617/26 and proper documentation—require full trial proceedings with evidence before granting injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts