parimala vs boominathan — 1/2026

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 31. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNKR110017562025

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

1651/2025

Filing Date

26-Dec-2025

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Conviction

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 31

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.parimala

    Adv. VIMALRAJ S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.boominathan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: STC 1/2026 Court: District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram Judge: Thiru R. Bagyaraj Date: 16.06.2026 Parties: Parimala (and two minors) v. Boominathan and others Decision: The court found respondent Boominathan guilty under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, Section 31, for violating a protection order (DVC 2/2021) issued on 24.07.2024. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year. Respondents 2 and 3 were acquitted as no orders were issued against them. The court held that Boominathan failed to comply with maintenance payments, jewelry restitution, and residence provisions mandated by the earlier protection order despite a two-year period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  5. 30-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  6. 12-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  7. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  8. 05-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  9. 05-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  10. 28-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  11. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  12. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  13. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  14. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  15. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  16. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  17. 10-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  18. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  19. 24-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  20. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  21. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  22. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  23. 07-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  24. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 26-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC 1/2026 Court: District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram Judge: Thiru R. Bagyaraj Date: 16.06.2026 Parties: Parimala (and two minors) v. Boominathan and others Decision: The court found respondent Boominathan guilty under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, Section 31, for violating a protection order (DVC 2/2021) issued on 24.07.2024. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year. Respondents 2 and 3 were acquitted as no orders were issued against them. The court held that Boominathan failed to comply with maintenance payments, jewelry restitution, and residence provisions mandated by the earlier protection order despite a two-year period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case