Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Malar — 521/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR110012432025
e-Filing Number
28-04-2025
Filing Number
1153/2025
Filing Date
29-04-2025
Registration No
521/2025
Registration Date
18-07-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
Lallapettai P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)
Adv. APP GRADE 2
Respondent(s)
Malar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Framing of Charges
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-02-2026 | Questioning | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-01-2026 | Framing of Charges |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused Malar of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged illegal possession and sale of 28 bottles of Black Pearl Brandy on March 26, 2025. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting discrepancies in the evidence and documentation procedures, and ordered the accused's release from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused Malar of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged illegal possession and sale of 28 bottles of Black Pearl Brandy on March 26, 2025. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting discrepancies in the evidence and documentation procedures, and ordered the accused's release from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts