Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Thangarasu (Cholan) — 451/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR110011562025
e-Filing Number
04-07-2025
Filing Number
1066/2025
Filing Date
10-07-2025
Registration No
451/2025
Registration Date
18-07-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
Lallapettai P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)
Adv. APP GRADE 2
Respondent(s)
Thangarasu (Cholan)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Framing of Charges
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-02-2026 | Questioning | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-01-2026 | Framing of Charges |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Thangarasu (alias Perumazhvan), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged offense of possessing and selling approximately 29 bottles of Express Brandy beyond permitted limits, as the charge could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Thangarasu (alias Perumazhvan), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged offense of possessing and selling approximately 29 bottles of Express Brandy beyond permitted limits, as the charge could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts