Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Thangarasu (Cholan) — 451/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR110011562025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-07-2025

Filing Number

1066/2025

Filing Date

10-07-2025

Registration No

451/2025

Registration Date

18-07-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

98

Police Station

Lallapettai P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(C )

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)

Adv. APP GRADE 2

Respondent(s)

Thangarasu (Cholan)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

17-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Judgement

23-02-2026

Questioning

13-02-2026

Evidence

20-01-2026

Framing of Charges

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Thangarasu (alias Perumazhvan), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged offense of possessing and selling approximately 29 bottles of Express Brandy beyond permitted limits, as the charge could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Thangarasu (alias Perumazhvan), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged offense of possessing and selling approximately 29 bottles of Express Brandy beyond permitted limits, as the charge could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case