Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Dhanam — 445/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR110011502025
e-Filing Number
04-07-2025
Filing Number
1060/2025
Filing Date
10-07-2025
Registration No
445/2025
Registration Date
18-07-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
92
Police Station
Lallapettai P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)
Adv. APP GRADE 2
Respondent(s)
Dhanam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Framing of Charges
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-02-2026 | Questioning | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-01-2026 | Framing of Charges |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused Dhanam of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while police seized 29 bottles of Express Brandy allegedly intended for sale, procedural and evidentiary inconsistencies—particularly the preparation of seizure and destruction memos before the first information report was filed—undermined the reliability of the government's evidence and warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused Dhanam of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while police seized 29 bottles of Express Brandy allegedly intended for sale, procedural and evidentiary inconsistencies—particularly the preparation of seizure and destruction memos before the first information report was filed—undermined the reliability of the government's evidence and warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts