Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Dhanam — 445/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR110011502025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-07-2025

Filing Number

1060/2025

Filing Date

10-07-2025

Registration No

445/2025

Registration Date

18-07-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

92

Police Station

Lallapettai P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(C )

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)

Adv. APP GRADE 2

Respondent(s)

Dhanam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

17-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Judgement

23-02-2026

Questioning

13-02-2026

Evidence

13-01-2026

Framing of Charges

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused Dhanam of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while police seized 29 bottles of Express Brandy allegedly intended for sale, procedural and evidentiary inconsistencies—particularly the preparation of seizure and destruction memos before the first information report was filed—undermined the reliability of the government's evidence and warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused Dhanam of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while police seized 29 bottles of Express Brandy allegedly intended for sale, procedural and evidentiary inconsistencies—particularly the preparation of seizure and destruction memos before the first information report was filed—undermined the reliability of the government's evidence and warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case