Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Selvaraj — 440/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR110011432025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-06-2025

Filing Number

1053/2025

Filing Date

30-06-2025

Registration No

440/2025

Registration Date

17-07-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

140

Police Station

Lallapettai P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(C )

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Selvaraj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

10-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Judgement

09-03-2026

Questioning

19-02-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Framing of Charges

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted Selvaraj of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024. The court found that while the prosecution alleged he was caught with 28 bottles of Express Brandy intended for illegal sale, critical procedural inconsistencies undermined the case—notably, the seizure memo and destruction record showed contradictory timings, and the allegedly seized alcohol was destroyed without proper scientific analysis or court presentation as evidence. Due to these reasonable doubts, the accused was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted Selvaraj of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024. The court found that while the prosecution alleged he was caught with 28 bottles of Express Brandy intended for illegal sale, critical procedural inconsistencies undermined the case—notably, the seizure memo and destruction record showed contradictory timings, and the allegedly seized alcohol was destroyed without proper scientific analysis or court presentation as evidence. Due to these reasonable doubts, the accused was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case