Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Dhanam — 428/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR110011312025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-07-2025

Filing Number

1041/2025

Filing Date

14-07-2025

Registration No

428/2025

Registration Date

16-07-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

221

Police Station

Lallapettai P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(C )

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Dhanam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

17-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Judgement

23-02-2026

Questioning

13-02-2026

Evidence

13-01-2026

Framing of Charges

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Dhanam (age 57), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that critical procedural irregularities—including seizure documents prepared before the FIR was registered and contradictions in witness statements regarding seizure location and timing—rendered the charge sheet unreliable and untrustworthy. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1) and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Dhanam (age 57), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that critical procedural irregularities—including seizure documents prepared before the FIR was registered and contradictions in witness statements regarding seizure location and timing—rendered the charge sheet unreliable and untrustworthy. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1) and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case