Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps vs Dhanam — 428/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C ). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR110011312025
e-Filing Number
12-07-2025
Filing Number
1041/2025
Filing Date
14-07-2025
Registration No
428/2025
Registration Date
16-07-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
221
Police Station
Lallapettai P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police Lalapettai Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Dhanam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Framing of Charges
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-02-2026 | Questioning | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-01-2026 | Framing of Charges |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Dhanam (age 57), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that critical procedural irregularities—including seizure documents prepared before the FIR was registered and contradictions in witness statements regarding seizure location and timing—rendered the charge sheet unreliable and untrustworthy. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1) and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Krishnarayapuram acquitted the accused, Dhanam (age 57), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that critical procedural irregularities—including seizure documents prepared before the FIR was registered and contradictions in witness statements regarding seizure location and timing—rendered the charge sheet unreliable and untrustworthy. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1) and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts