INSPECTOR OF POLICE, LALAPETTAI POLICE STATION vs DINESH — 231/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A),338,196,181(3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKR110009412025
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
853/2025
Filing Date
27-09-2021
Registration No
231/2025
Registration Date
27-09-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
FIR Details
FIR Number
329
Police Station
Lallapettai P.S
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, LALAPETTAI POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
DINESH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this civil case (CC 231/2025) dated 25.02.2026 from the District Civil and Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram, the court conducted cross-examination of a witness (A. Sa. 8 Senthilkumar) in a matter involving a road accident on the Chennai-Trichy National Highway. The court's detailed cross-examination notes identified multiple inconsistencies and irregularities in the police investigation, including fabricated witnesses, improper vehicle details, procedural violations, and lack of genuine eyewitnesses. The court rejected the prosecution's version of events and found the investigation to be compromised, ultimately determining that the case lacks credible evidence and proper procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this civil case (CC 231/2025) dated 25.02.2026 from the District Civil and Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram, the court conducted cross-examination of a witness (A. Sa. 8 Senthilkumar) in a matter involving a road accident on the Chennai-Trichy National Highway. The court's detailed cross-examination notes identified multiple inconsistencies and irregularities in the police investigation, including fabricated witnesses, improper vehicle details, procedural violations, and lack of genuine eyewitnesses. The court rejected the prosecution's version of events and found the investigation to be compromised, ultimately determining that the case lacks credible evidence and proper procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts