INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALAPETTAI POLICE STATION vs SAGADEVAN — 199/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 468,471. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKR110008792025

Filing Number

791/2025

Filing Date

03-Feb-2018

Registration No

199/2025

Registration Date

03-Feb-2018

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

273

Police Station

Lalapettai Police Station

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALAPETTAI POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP GRADE 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAGADEVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CC 199/2025 Court Decision: The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sagadevan of charges under IPC Sections 468 (forgery) and 471 (using forged documents). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: Sagadevan was accused of affixing a fake registration number (TN-30-X-6558) as a sticker on a vehicle (originally numbered TN-47-L-1150) to illegally extract sand from a government quarry on July 24, 2017. While the police established that a fake number plate existed, they could not conclusively prove that Sagadevan affixed it with criminal intent or fraudulently operated the vehicle, as the owner's authorization documents were not verified through proper channels (RTO investigation). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  14. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  15. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  18. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  19. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  20. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  21. 13-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 03-Feb-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 199/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CC 199/2025 Court Decision: The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sagadevan of charges under IPC Sections 468 (forgery) and 471 (using forged documents). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: Sagadevan was accused of affixing a fake registration number (TN-30-X-6558) as a sticker on a vehicle (originally numbered TN-47-L-1150) to illegally extract sand from a government quarry on July 24, 2017. While the police established that a fake number plate existed, they could not conclusively prove that Sagadevan affixed it with criminal intent or fraudulently operated the vehicle, as the owner's authorization documents were not verified through proper channels (RTO investigation). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case