MURUGANANTHAM vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALAPET PS Advocate - APP GRADE 2 — 38/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKR110000912026

Filing Number

78/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

38/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

453

Police Station

Lallapettai P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURUGANANTHAM

    Adv. D.SARAVANAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALAPET PS (Police Station) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) GRADE 2

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Judicial Magistrate Court at Krishnarayapuram granted the petition and ordered release of the seized Honda Motorcycle (TN-47-CY-2801) to the third party/petitioner on interim custody basis, subject to conditions including executing a bond of ₹40,000 and submitting photographs with prescribed documentation. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle due to natural wear and tear, and interim custody with the owner was more appropriate pending case trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judicial Magistrate Court at Krishnarayapuram granted the petition and ordered release of the seized Honda Motorcycle (TN-47-CY-2801) to the third party/petitioner on interim custody basis, subject to conditions including executing a bond of ₹40,000 and submitting photographs with prescribed documentation. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle due to natural wear and tear, and interim custody with the owner was more appropriate pending case trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case