MURUGANANTHAM vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALAPET PS Advocate - APP GRADE 2 — 38/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503,. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKR110000912026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
78/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnarayapuram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
453
Police Station
Lallapettai P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MURUGANANTHAM
Adv. D.SARAVANAN
Respondent(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALAPET PS (Police Station) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) GRADE 2
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram
Disposed
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Judicial Magistrate Court at Krishnarayapuram granted the petition and ordered release of the seized Honda Motorcycle (TN-47-CY-2801) to the third party/petitioner on interim custody basis, subject to conditions including executing a bond of ₹40,000 and submitting photographs with prescribed documentation. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle due to natural wear and tear, and interim custody with the owner was more appropriate pending case trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Judicial Magistrate Court at Krishnarayapuram granted the petition and ordered release of the seized Honda Motorcycle (TN-47-CY-2801) to the third party/petitioner on interim custody basis, subject to conditions including executing a bond of ₹40,000 and submitting photographs with prescribed documentation. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle due to natural wear and tear, and interim custody with the owner was more appropriate pending case trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts