LAVANYA vs GOBINATH — 44/2023
Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
DVC - Domestic Violence Case
CNR: TNKR100010722023
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1072/2023
Filing Date
16-06-2023
Registration No
44/2023
Registration Date
16-06-2023
Court
Additional Mahila Court at Magisterial Level, Karur
Judge
13-Judicial Magistrate Additional Mahila Court Karur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAVANYA
Adv. T.VEERAMANI
Respondent(s)
GOBINATH
DEVI
Adv. A.RAMESH
KUMARESAN
Adv. A.RAMESH
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Judicial Magistrate Additional Mahila Court Karur
Mediation
Restored
Counter
Disposed
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Mediation | |
| 09-03-2026 | Restored | |
| 09-03-2026 | Counter | |
| 25-10-2024 | Disposed | |
| 23-10-2024 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The Additional Mahila Court, Karur partly allowed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that petitioner Lavanya was subjected to domestic violence (physical abuse, dowry harassment, and economic deprivation) by her mother-in-law (2nd respondent) and brother-in-law (3rd respondent). The court rejected her request for property partition but granted: (1) a protection order restraining the respondents from domestic violence; (2) a residence order directing the 2nd respondent to provide accommodation with all facilities; and (3) compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The Additional Mahila Court, Karur partly allowed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that petitioner Lavanya was subjected to domestic violence (physical abuse, dowry harassment, and economic deprivation) by her mother-in-law (2nd respondent) and brother-in-law (3rd respondent). The court rejected her request for property partition but granted: (1) a protection order restraining the respondents from domestic violence; (2) a residence order directing the 2nd respondent to provide accommodation with all facilities; and (3) compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts