FAMILY MANAGER MALAIYANDI vs RAJALINGAM Advocate - R.KRISHNASAMY — 154/2021

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090002252021

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

301/2021

Filing Date

08-11-2021

Registration No

154/2021

Registration Date

08-11-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

FAMILY MANAGER MALAIYANDI

Adv. JAFFAR SHAT

Respondent(s)

RAJALINGAM Advocate - R.KRISHNASAMY

THIRUMUDI @ AYYAR

Adv. R.KRISHNASAMY

JEEVAN PRAKASH

Adv. EXPARTE

VAIRAPERUMAL

Adv. EXPARTE

Hearing History

Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

15-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

30-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

23-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

11-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

11-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

19-08-2025
Copy of Judgment

The Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai allowed the petition filed by Malaiyandi to set aside the ex-parte order dated 24.04.2024. The court found that while the petitioner's explanation for not filing a counter was insufficient, natural justice principles required the dispute be adjudicated on merits rather than technicalities. The petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 500 costs to the respondents on or before 29.08.2025, failing which the order would stand automatically vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai allowed the petition filed by Malaiyandi to set aside the ex-parte order dated 24.04.2024. The court found that while the petitioner's explanation for not filing a counter was insufficient, natural justice principles required the dispute be adjudicated on merits rather than technicalities. The petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 500 costs to the respondents on or before 29.08.2025, failing which the order would stand automatically vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case