PONNUSAMY vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KARUR AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER — 134/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090002162020
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
319/2020
Filing Date
06-10-2020
Registration No
134/2020
Registration Date
16-10-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PONNUSAMY
Adv. S.JAYASRI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KARUR AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THASILDAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SUB REGISTRAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
BRANCH MANAGER
Adv. EXPARTE
RASU
Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY-MS/149/
R. PONNUSAMY
Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 07-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Additional District Civil Court in Cuddalore granted the petitioners' (defendants 6 and 7) application to recall witness W.A.1 (plaintiff's witness) for cross-examination by the petitioners' counsel. The court found the petitioners' grounds reasonable, noting that W.A.1's cross-examination was incomplete and the case required reopening of plaintiff's evidence to ensure fair proceedings and prevent injustice to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Additional District Civil Court in Cuddalore granted the petitioners' (defendants 6 and 7) application to recall witness W.A.1 (plaintiff's witness) for cross-examination by the petitioners' counsel. The court found the petitioners' grounds reasonable, noting that W.A.1's cross-examination was incomplete and the case required reopening of plaintiff's evidence to ensure fair proceedings and prevent injustice to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts