Ramasamy vs Adham Ali — 25/2026
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section or7 r1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090002112025
e-Filing Number
27-11-2025
Filing Number
255/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
25/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramasamy
Adv. Bhaskar S
Dharmaraj
Adv. Bhaskar S
Vellaiyammal
Adv. Bhaskar S
Roja
Adv. Bhaskar S
Respondent(s)
Adham Ali
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 07-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
This Tamil judgment from the Kulithalai Primary District Court (O.S. No. 25/2026, dated 26.03.2026) allows the plaintiffs' claim to have an encumbered property registration (Entry No. 01/1989) declared void and removed from the registrar's records within two months. The court found that the defendants failed to take any legal action to enforce a 1989 execution decree against the property, effectively abandoning their claim, and accepted the plaintiffs' evidence establishing their rightful possession and heirship of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
This Tamil judgment from the Kulithalai Primary District Court (O.S. No. 25/2026, dated 26.03.2026) allows the plaintiffs' claim to have an encumbered property registration (Entry No. 01/1989) declared void and removed from the registrar's records within two months. The court found that the defendants failed to take any legal action to enforce a 1989 execution decree against the property, effectively abandoning their claim, and accepted the plaintiffs' evidence establishing their rightful possession and heirship of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts