M.Rajalingam and M.Sivalingam vs R.SENTHILVELRAJAN AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL — 127/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090001862023
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
239/2023
Filing Date
09-10-2023
Registration No
127/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Rajalingam and M.Sivalingam
Adv. R.RATHAKRISHNAN
Respondent(s)
R.SENTHILVELRAJAN AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL
R.KARTHIKEYAN
Adv. R.M.SENTHIL
R.DURAIRAJAN
Adv. R.M.SENTHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Trial
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 12-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 02-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 20-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the plaintiff's Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. 07/2025) seeking permission to file an additional reply affidavit under CPC Order 8 Rule 9. The court found that the supplementary affidavit filed by the plaintiffs merely refuted the defendants' reply without introducing substantive new facts, and lacked justifiable grounds for acceptance. The application was accordingly rejected without any costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the plaintiff's Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. 07/2025) seeking permission to file an additional reply affidavit under CPC Order 8 Rule 9. The court found that the supplementary affidavit filed by the plaintiffs merely refuted the defendants' reply without introducing substantive new facts, and lacked justifiable grounds for acceptance. The application was accordingly rejected without any costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts