ANANTHAN @ SATHEES vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KARUR AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER — 118/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Additional Written Statement. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090001572022
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
211/2022
Filing Date
26-08-2022
Registration No
118/2022
Registration Date
26-08-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANANTHAN @ SATHEES
Adv. N.MANOHARAN
Respondent(s)
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KARUR AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Adv. K.S.M.SHAHUL HAMEED
THE THASILDAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THE REVENUE INSPECTOR
Adv. V.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Adv. V.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
RAJAGOPAL
Adv. V.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Additional Written Statement
Additional Written Statement
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Additional Written Statement | |
| 16-04-2026 | Additional Written Statement | |
| 01-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 30-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 26-03-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
The petition was allowed. The court ordered that three necessary parties—the relatives of the 6th respondent (Pasupramanian and Krishnamoorthy) and the Cuddalore Municipal Commissioner—be added as defendants to the civil suit regarding a tea shop property dispute. The court found these parties essential to the case as they have direct interests in the property and their rights would be affected by the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition was allowed. The court ordered that three necessary parties—the relatives of the 6th respondent (Pasupramanian and Krishnamoorthy) and the Cuddalore Municipal Commissioner—be added as defendants to the civil suit regarding a tea shop property dispute. The court found these parties essential to the case as they have direct interests in the property and their rights would be affected by the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts