GOVINDARAJ vs SEENIVASAN Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL — 116/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7,R.1. Status: List / Special List. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

List / Special List Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090001312024

Filing Number

202/2024

Filing Date

22-Oct-2024

Registration No

116/2024

Registration Date

22-Oct-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7,R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDARAJ

    Adv. S.MURUGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SEENIVASAN Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL

  2. 2.DURAIRAJ

    Adv. R.M.SENTHIL

  3. 3.GOPAL

    Adv. R.M.SENTHIL

  4. 4.KALIYAMMAL

    Adv. R.M.SENTHIL

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    List / Special List

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Mediation

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Mediation

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Mediation

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 116/2024 The Court allowed the petition filed by defendants Srinivasan, Durairaj, Gopal, and Kaliyammal to set aside the ex parte order dated 03.03.2025 passed against them in a permanent injunction suit filed by plaintiff Govindaraj. The court found the defendants' explanation acceptable—that they failed to file their written statement due to poor communication with their original counsel and lack of knowledge about court procedures as rural villagers. However, as a condition and to balance equities, the defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiff by 16.11.2025, failing which the order would be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  14. 23-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  16. 07-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  17. 15-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  19. 26-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  20. 13-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  21. 30-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  22. 21-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  23. 14-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  24. 10-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  25. 27-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  26. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  27. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  28. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  29. 04-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  30. 03-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  31. 01-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  32. 24-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  33. 18-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  34. 20-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  35. 06-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  36. 22-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  37. 22-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 22-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 116/2024 The Court allowed the petition filed by defendants Srinivasan, Durairaj, Gopal, and Kaliyammal to set aside the ex parte order dated 03.03.2025 passed against them in a permanent injunction suit filed by plaintiff Govindaraj. The court found the defendants' explanation acceptable—that they failed to file their written statement due to poor communication with their original counsel and lack of knowledge about court procedures as rural villagers. However, as a condition and to balance equities, the defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 500 costs to the plaintiff by 16.11.2025, failing which the order would be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case