PERIYASAMY AND ANOTHER vs POSHIYAN AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - N.MANOHARAN — 81/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090001132023

Trial

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

140/2023

Filing Date

05-06-2023

Registration No

81/2023

Registration Date

05-06-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

PERIYASAMY AND ANOTHER

Adv. A.JAFFER SHAT

MARIYAYEE

Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

Respondent(s)

POSHIYAN AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - N.MANOHARAN

PALANISAMY

Adv. N.MANOHARAN

MURUGESAN

Adv. N.MANOHARAN

MATHIYAZHAGAN

Adv. N.MANOHARAN

VAIRAMANI

Adv. N.MANOHARAN

ARULRAJ

Adv. N.MANOHARAN

BAMBAN

Adv. N.MANOHARAN

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

16-04-2026

Trial

07-04-2026

Trial

09-03-2026

IA Pending

20-02-2026

IA Pending

12-01-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

12-01-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The petition is dismissed. The Primary District Civil Court in Kulithalai held that the plaintiffs failed to establish grounds for appointing a court commissioner to re-survey the agricultural property (Survey No. 823/1C1B). Since the property boundaries and measurements were already clearly documented in the site plan with proper dimensions, no further survey was necessary, and the defendants' opposition to the petition was valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition is dismissed. The Primary District Civil Court in Kulithalai held that the plaintiffs failed to establish grounds for appointing a court commissioner to re-survey the agricultural property (Survey No. 823/1C1B). Since the property boundaries and measurements were already clearly documented in the site plan with proper dimensions, no further survey was necessary, and the defendants' opposition to the petition was valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case