EMAYAMANIVASAGAM (a) MANICKAVASAGAM vs TAMILNADU STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KARUR AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER — 123/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7R.1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090000972025

Filing Number

115/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

123/2025

Registration Date

22-Jul-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EMAYAMANIVASAGAM (a) MANICKAVASAGAM

    Adv. P.NAGESWARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAMILNADU STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KARUR AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.THE TAHSILDAR

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  3. 3.VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION OFFICER

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  4. 4.THE SUB REGISTRAR

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  5. 5.SATHAVELAR

    Adv. M.Gayathiri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Summary The Primary District Civil Court at Kulithalai declared that the two names "Manikavāsagam" and "Iyannivasagam" recorded in the 1984 land deed (Document No. 619/1984) refer to the same person—the plaintiff. The court allowed the plaintiff's declaration suit based on evidence including school certificates, government documents, and property records, all consistently showing one identity despite the name variations that arose from administrative errors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  12. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  14. 19-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  15. 19-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  16. 08-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  18. 26-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  19. 20-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  20. 30-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  21. 22-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  22. 22-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  23. 22-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  24. 22-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 123/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Primary District Civil Court at Kulithalai declared that the two names "Manikavāsagam" and "Iyannivasagam" recorded in the 1984 land deed (Document No. 619/1984) refer to the same person—the plaintiff. The court allowed the plaintiff's declaration suit based on evidence including school certificates, government documents, and property records, all consistently showing one identity despite the name variations that arose from administrative errors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case