SHANMUGAM (JOINT FAMILY MANAGER) vs SUPPAMMAL AND 11 OTHERS Advocate - R.KRISHNASWAMY — 81/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090000962024

Filing Number

157/2024

Filing Date

13-Aug-2024

Registration No

81/2024

Registration Date

13-Aug-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANMUGAM (JOINT FAMILY MANAGER)

    Adv. K.SAKTHIVEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUPPAMMAL AND 11 OTHERS Advocate - R.KRISHNASWAMY

  2. 2.Subramaniyan

    Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

  3. 3.Nagarethinam

    Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

  4. 4.Prabavathi

    Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

  5. 5.Nagamuthu

    Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

  6. 6.Perumal

  7. 7.Thiyagarajan

  8. 8.The District Registrar , Karur

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  9. 9.The Sub Registrar, Tharagampatty

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER,GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  10. 10.The District Collector , karur

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  11. 11.The revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  12. 12.The Thahsildar, Kadavoor

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    This is a cross-examination record from Original Case No. 81/2024 at the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. The witness (plaintiff's witness Shanmugam) testified regarding alleged forged documents and land deeds, claiming defendants 8-12 created fraudulent records and requesting cancellation. The court found defendants 8-12 were properly performing their duties and ruled that dismissing them from the case as unnecessary parties was inappropriate, thus rejecting the plaintiff's request to exclude them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  14. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  15. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  16. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  17. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  18. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  19. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  20. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  21. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  23. 07-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  24. 08-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  25. 30-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  26. 27-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  27. 25-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  28. 05-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  29. 17-Mar-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  30. 20-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  31. 24-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  32. 20-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  33. 20-Dec-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  34. 20-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  35. 21-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  36. 20-Sep-2024

    Batta

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  37. 13-Sep-2024

    Batta

    Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

  38. 13-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 13-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination record from Original Case No. 81/2024 at the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. The witness (plaintiff's witness Shanmugam) testified regarding alleged forged documents and land deeds, claiming defendants 8-12 created fraudulent records and requesting cancellation. The court found defendants 8-12 were properly performing their duties and ruled that dismissing them from the case as unnecessary parties was inappropriate, thus rejecting the plaintiff's request to exclude them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case