SHANMUGAM (JOINT FAMILY MANAGER) vs SUPPAMMAL AND 11 OTHERS Advocate - R.KRISHNASWAMY — 81/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090000962024

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

157/2024

Filing Date

13-08-2024

Registration No

81/2024

Registration Date

13-08-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

SHANMUGAM (JOINT FAMILY MANAGER)

Adv. K.SAKTHIVEL

Respondent(s)

SUPPAMMAL AND 11 OTHERS Advocate - R.KRISHNASWAMY

Subramaniyan

Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

Nagarethinam

Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

Prabavathi

Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

Nagamuthu

Adv. R.KRISHNASWAMY

Perumal

Thiyagarajan

The District Registrar , Karur

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Sub Registrar, Tharagampatty

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER,GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The District Collector , karur

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Thahsildar, Kadavoor

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

20-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

This is a cross-examination record from Original Case No. 81/2024 at the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. The witness (plaintiff's witness Shanmugam) testified regarding alleged forged documents and land deeds, claiming defendants 8-12 created fraudulent records and requesting cancellation. The court found defendants 8-12 were properly performing their duties and ruled that dismissing them from the case as unnecessary parties was inappropriate, thus rejecting the plaintiff's request to exclude them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination record from Original Case No. 81/2024 at the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. The witness (plaintiff's witness Shanmugam) testified regarding alleged forged documents and land deeds, claiming defendants 8-12 created fraudulent records and requesting cancellation. The court found defendants 8-12 were properly performing their duties and ruled that dismissing them from the case as unnecessary parties was inappropriate, thus rejecting the plaintiff's request to exclude them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case