M.JAYAKUMAR vs CHINNATHAMBI PILLAI — 90/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR 7 R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090000922025
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
110/2025
Filing Date
30-04-2025
Registration No
90/2025
Registration Date
30-04-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.JAYAKUMAR
Adv. M.VIJAYASARATHI
Respondent(s)
CHINNATHAMBI PILLAI
MARIMUTHUPILLAI
CELLAPATTUR ROJA
RANJITHA
RAMA
SHEELA DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 23-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 04-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai Case: Original Case 90/2025 Outcome: The cross-examination of Defendants 1 and 2 was recorded on 08.04.2026 under Section 44/1969. The witness (plaintiff's side) testified regarding property ownership, family genealogy, and a partition deed from 25.03.1966 dividing Survey No. 440/8. The witness confirmed that all ancestral property has been sold to one Rabiq, and that Defendants 1 and 2 represent the successors of Mutthiya Pillai. The cross-examination was adjourned and will continue as directed by the defendants' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai Case: Original Case 90/2025 Outcome: The cross-examination of Defendants 1 and 2 was recorded on 08.04.2026 under Section 44/1969. The witness (plaintiff's side) testified regarding property ownership, family genealogy, and a partition deed from 25.03.1966 dividing Survey No. 440/8. The witness confirmed that all ancestral property has been sold to one Rabiq, and that Defendants 1 and 2 represent the successors of Mutthiya Pillai. The cross-examination was adjourned and will continue as directed by the defendants' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts