E.VELLAIAMMAL vs P.RAMASAMY AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - M.SAKTHIVEL — 1300087/2014
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7R1. Status: Batta. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNKR090000842014
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1300087/2014
Filing Date
25-04-2014
Registration No
1300087/2014
Registration Date
25-04-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
E.VELLAIAMMAL
Adv. C.SELVAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
P.RAMASAMY AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - M.SAKTHIVEL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, (VILLAGE PANCHAYAT)
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Batta
Batta
Batta
Batta
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Batta | |
| 08-04-2026 | Batta | |
| 30-03-2026 | Batta | |
| 16-03-2026 | Batta | |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination record in Original Case No. 87/2014 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. Plaintiff's witness testified under Section 44/1969 on 03.03.2026 regarding a will dispute involving property (Survey Nos. 99/2 and 99/7) and contested claims about property inheritance and transfer to the 4th defendant. The court recorded the witness's testimony and examination in open court, which was read over, interpreted, and acknowledged as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination record in Original Case No. 87/2014 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. Plaintiff's witness testified under Section 44/1969 on 03.03.2026 regarding a will dispute involving property (Survey Nos. 99/2 and 99/7) and contested claims about property inheritance and transfer to the 4th defendant. The court recorded the witness's testimony and examination in open court, which was read over, interpreted, and acknowledged as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts