P.SEMBAYEE vs V.THANGAVEL (DIED)AND 4 OTHERS — 1300046/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090000752018
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1300072/2018
Filing Date
06-03-2018
Registration No
1300046/2018
Registration Date
06-03-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.SEMBAYEE
Adv. K.S.M.SHAHUL HAMEED
Respondent(s)
V.THANGAVEL (DIED)AND 4 OTHERS
KANNAPPAN(Died)
U.THANGARASU
Adv. EXPARTE
VALARMATHI
Adv. EXPARTE
CHINNAMMAL
Adv. EXPARTE
Sarasu
Senthilkumar
Kamalam
Revathi
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 46/2018 before the Additional District Munsif Court, Kulithalai, the plaintiff's witness (M. Periyasamy) was examined under Section 44/1969 and cross-examined on 10.03.2026 regarding a mortgage dispute involving immovable property. The cross-examination of defendants 3, 6-8 was continued, with the witness providing testimony about property boundaries, possession periods, and land usage rights. The court adjourned the cross-examination of defendants 3, 6-8 to a future date as requested by their counsel, with the case proceeding on the merits of the mortgage and possession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 46/2018 before the Additional District Munsif Court, Kulithalai, the plaintiff's witness (M. Periyasamy) was examined under Section 44/1969 and cross-examined on 10.03.2026 regarding a mortgage dispute involving immovable property. The cross-examination of defendants 3, 6-8 was continued, with the witness providing testimony about property boundaries, possession periods, and land usage rights. The court adjourned the cross-examination of defendants 3, 6-8 to a future date as requested by their counsel, with the case proceeding on the merits of the mortgage and possession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts