KARUPPANNAN AND 3 OTHERS vs MUGIL Advocate - A.JAFFAR SHAT — 53/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090000552024
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100/2024
Filing Date
26-04-2024
Registration No
53/2024
Registration Date
10-06-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARUPPANNAN AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU
KAMATCHI
Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU
SHIVAKUMAR
Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU
IYYAR
Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU
Respondent(s)
MUGIL Advocate - A.JAFFAR SHAT
AKASH
Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT
RADHA
Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT
SHIYAMALA
Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT
SATHIYARAJ
Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 53/2024 | Court: Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai This civil suit concerns a land dispute involving agricultural property (Tava land). The defendant-witness testified regarding a 1997 oral lease agreement between the plaintiffs and one Ayyanan Chettyar, following which the plaintiffs cultivated the land. The witness denied producing receipts, authenticated documents, or proper possession records; he also admitted the defendants failed to provide legal eviction notices and continue to occupy the property. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony on 08.04.2026, documenting the witness's admissions and contradictions regarding the parties' claims to the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 53/2024 | Court: Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai This civil suit concerns a land dispute involving agricultural property (Tava land). The defendant-witness testified regarding a 1997 oral lease agreement between the plaintiffs and one Ayyanan Chettyar, following which the plaintiffs cultivated the land. The witness denied producing receipts, authenticated documents, or proper possession records; he also admitted the defendants failed to provide legal eviction notices and continue to occupy the property. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony on 08.04.2026, documenting the witness's admissions and contradictions regarding the parties' claims to the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts