KARUPPANNAN AND 3 OTHERS vs MUGIL Advocate - A.JAFFAR SHAT — 53/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090000552024

Arguments

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100/2024

Filing Date

26-04-2024

Registration No

53/2024

Registration Date

10-06-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

KARUPPANNAN AND 3 OTHERS

Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU

KAMATCHI

Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU

SHIVAKUMAR

Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU

IYYAR

Adv. R.SELVAMUTHU

Respondent(s)

MUGIL Advocate - A.JAFFAR SHAT

AKASH

Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

RADHA

Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

SHIYAMALA

Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

SATHIYARAJ

Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

16-04-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Arguments

08-04-2026

Evidence

27-03-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

08-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 53/2024 | Court: Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai This civil suit concerns a land dispute involving agricultural property (Tava land). The defendant-witness testified regarding a 1997 oral lease agreement between the plaintiffs and one Ayyanan Chettyar, following which the plaintiffs cultivated the land. The witness denied producing receipts, authenticated documents, or proper possession records; he also admitted the defendants failed to provide legal eviction notices and continue to occupy the property. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony on 08.04.2026, documenting the witness's admissions and contradictions regarding the parties' claims to the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 53/2024 | Court: Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai This civil suit concerns a land dispute involving agricultural property (Tava land). The defendant-witness testified regarding a 1997 oral lease agreement between the plaintiffs and one Ayyanan Chettyar, following which the plaintiffs cultivated the land. The witness denied producing receipts, authenticated documents, or proper possession records; he also admitted the defendants failed to provide legal eviction notices and continue to occupy the property. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony on 08.04.2026, documenting the witness's admissions and contradictions regarding the parties' claims to the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case