RAJALINGAN AND 5 OTHERS vs PACHAIYAMMAL Advocate - EXP — 54/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7R.1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090000332025

Filing Number

39/2025

Filing Date

07-Feb-2025

Registration No

54/2025

Registration Date

27-Mar-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJALINGAN AND 5 OTHERS

    Adv. S.PARTHIBAN

  2. 2.SIRUMPAYEE

    Adv. S.PARTHIBAN

  3. 3.BALASUBRAMANI

    Adv. S.PARTHIBAN

  4. 4.RATHINAVEL

    Adv. S.PARTHIBAN

  5. 5.TAMILARASI

    Adv. S.PARTHIBAN

  6. 6.MUNIYAPPAN

    Adv. S.PARTHIBAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PACHAIYAMMAL Advocate - EXP

  2. 2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KARUR

    Adv. G.P

  3. 3.THASILDHAR, KADAVUR

    Adv. G.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional District Civil Court of Cuddalore declared that all six plaintiffs (children from two marriages of the deceased Palanisamy) are the legitimate heirs of the deceased, and ordered the revenue department (3rd defendant) to issue a succession certificate recognizing them as such. The court found that while the first defendant (2nd wife) married the deceased while his first wife was still alive, making her an invalid spouse, the children born to both marriages qualify as legal heirs under Hindu succession law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  18. 07-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  19. 24-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  20. 19-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  21. 10-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  22. 25-Aug-2025

    Batta

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  23. 06-Aug-2025

    Batta

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  24. 02-Aug-2025

    Batta

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    Batta

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  26. 07-Jul-2025

    Batta

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  27. 25-Jun-2025

    Batta

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  28. 06-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  29. 28-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

  30. 27-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 07-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District Civil Court of Cuddalore declared that all six plaintiffs (children from two marriages of the deceased Palanisamy) are the legitimate heirs of the deceased, and ordered the revenue department (3rd defendant) to issue a succession certificate recognizing them as such. The court found that while the first defendant (2nd wife) married the deceased while his first wife was still alive, making her an invalid spouse, the children born to both marriages qualify as legal heirs under Hindu succession law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case