SIRUMBAYEE vs LAKSHMAYEE Advocate - P.SARAVANAN — 24/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7,R1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090000282024

Amendment

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

51/2024

Filing Date

02-03-2024

Registration No

24/2024

Registration Date

05-03-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7,R1

Petitioner(s)

SIRUMBAYEE

Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

Respondent(s)

LAKSHMAYEE Advocate - P.SARAVANAN

Hearing History

Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai

17-04-2026

Amendment

07-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

26-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

11-02-2026
Copy of Judgment

This is a Tamil-language civil court order from the Additional District Court of Kalimath, dated February 11, 2026. Summary: The court allowed (permitted) the petition to amend the plaint in the pending civil suit. The petitioner/plaintiff sought to add defendants 2 and 3 to the original case and to include a relief claim regarding disputed property rights. The court found that the amendment was necessary and justified, particularly given that defendants 2 and 3 had been previously added to the case through an earlier order dated August 8, 2025, and that property disputes needed clarification in the amended pleadings before final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil-language civil court order from the Additional District Court of Kalimath, dated February 11, 2026. Summary: The court allowed (permitted) the petition to amend the plaint in the pending civil suit. The petitioner/plaintiff sought to add defendants 2 and 3 to the original case and to include a relief claim regarding disputed property rights. The court found that the amendment was necessary and justified, particularly given that defendants 2 and 3 had been previously added to the case through an earlier order dated August 8, 2025, and that property disputes needed clarification in the amended pleadings before final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case