VELLAIYAN vs BACKIYAM AND 01 ANOTHER Advocate - P.SARAVANAN — 18/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7,R1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090000242024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
37/2024
Filing Date
20-02-2024
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
22-02-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VELLAIYAN
Adv. T.FAKKRUDEEN
Respondent(s)
BACKIYAM AND 01 ANOTHER Advocate - P.SARAVANAN
KRISHNAVENI
Adv. P.SARAVANAN
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 27-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 07-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 18/2024 | Court: Additional District Court of Negapattinam (Tamil Nadu) | Date: April 20, 2026 Outcome: The petition filed by the plaintiff seeking permission to file a supplementary reply in the original suit was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff's reasons for delayed filing—that important documents were inadvertently lost—were not acceptable grounds, and that the plaintiff failed to establish that filing beyond the prescribed time limit was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 18/2024 | Court: Additional District Court of Negapattinam (Tamil Nadu) | Date: April 20, 2026 Outcome: The petition filed by the plaintiff seeking permission to file a supplementary reply in the original suit was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff's reasons for delayed filing—that important documents were inadvertently lost—were not acceptable grounds, and that the plaintiff failed to establish that filing beyond the prescribed time limit was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts