VENKATESH KUMAR vs SAROJA Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL — 3/2024
Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 10(2)(i),10(3)(C),14(1)(A). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNKR090000222024
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2024
Filing Number
34/2024
Filing Date
16-02-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
16-02-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VENKATESH KUMAR
Adv. RM.SIVAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
SAROJA Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 09-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 06-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 27-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination transcript in a property/tenancy dispute case (RLTOP 03/2024) before the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, affirming details about property ownership, rent payment obligations, and the circumstances leading to the filing of the original case. The court recorded the witness's responses to detailed questioning about the property's location, occupancy, rent amount (₹15,000), and the parties' conflicting claims regarding tenancy and property vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination transcript in a property/tenancy dispute case (RLTOP 03/2024) before the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, affirming details about property ownership, rent payment obligations, and the circumstances leading to the filing of the original case. The court recorded the witness's responses to detailed questioning about the property's location, occupancy, rent amount (₹15,000), and the parties' conflicting claims regarding tenancy and property vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts