VENKATESH KUMAR vs VIJAYALAKSHMI Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL — 1/2024
Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 10(2)(I),10(3) (C), 14(1)(A). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNKR090000202024
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2024
Filing Number
32/2024
Filing Date
16-02-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
16-02-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VENKATESH KUMAR
Adv. RM.SIVAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
VIJAYALAKSHMI Advocate - R.M.SENTHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 09-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 06-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 27-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
This document is a cross-examination record (not a final court order) from the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai, in a rent dispute case (RLTOP-01/2024). The witness testimony was recorded on 18.02.2026 under Section 44/1969. No substantive order granting/denying relief or adjournment decision is contained in this document—it only documents the defendant's witness examination statements regarding the tenancy arrangement and the tenant's 40-year occupation of the shop. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a cross-examination record (not a final court order) from the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai, in a rent dispute case (RLTOP-01/2024). The witness testimony was recorded on 18.02.2026 under Section 44/1969. No substantive order granting/denying relief or adjournment decision is contained in this document—it only documents the defendant's witness examination statements regarding the tenancy arrangement and the tenant's 40-year occupation of the shop. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts