SELVARAJ vs CHELLAMMAL AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - R.MOORTHY — 9/2021

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKR090000072021

IA Pending

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

7/2021

Filing Date

05-01-2021

Registration No

9/2021

Registration Date

11-01-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai

Judge

13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

SELVARAJ

Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

Respondent(s)

CHELLAMMAL AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - R.MOORTHY

SATHISHKUMAR

Adv. R.MOORTHY

SRI DEVI

Adv. R.MOORTHY

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Principal District Munsif, Kulithalai

10-04-2026

IA Pending

06-04-2026

IA Pending

02-04-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: 09/2021, Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai Outcome: This is a civil property dispute involving cross-examination of the defendant's witness recorded on 25.02.2026. The witness testified regarding ownership and possession of a property (Plot B), document authenticity, property tax receipts, and disputed land transactions worth ₹15,000. The witness denied key allegations made by the plaintiff, including claims that the first defendant transferred the property and interfered with plaintiff's possession. The court recorded the witness's testimony which remains subject to further proceedings and final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: 09/2021, Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithalai Outcome: This is a civil property dispute involving cross-examination of the defendant's witness recorded on 25.02.2026. The witness testified regarding ownership and possession of a property (Plot B), document authenticity, property tax receipts, and disputed land transactions worth ₹15,000. The witness denied key allegations made by the plaintiff, including claims that the first defendant transferred the property and interfered with plaintiff's possession. The court recorded the witness's testimony which remains subject to further proceedings and final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kulithalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case