T.JAYAKUMAR vs KUMARESAN AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - V.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN — 36/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090000062024
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
22-01-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
21-03-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.JAYAKUMAR
Adv. R.M.SENTHIL
Respondent(s)
KUMARESAN AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - V.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
RAVINA
Adv. S.KIRUTHIKA
THE THASILDHAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THE HEAD SURVEYOR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THE DISTRICTR COLLECTOR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Original Case 36/2024 — Additional District Munsif Court, Kulithalai The court recorded cross-examination of the defendant's witness (Radhika) on 06.04.2026 regarding disputed property transactions involving undivided land (Survey No. 448/3B2B). The witness testimony established a chain of property transfers: the plaintiff's husband purchased 2/4 share, subsequently transferred 3/4 share to Kumaresan, who then sold it to the plaintiff. The case involves disputes over property partition and the legality of construction on undivided property. Case adjourned for cross-examination of defendants 2-6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Original Case 36/2024 — Additional District Munsif Court, Kulithalai The court recorded cross-examination of the defendant's witness (Radhika) on 06.04.2026 regarding disputed property transactions involving undivided land (Survey No. 448/3B2B). The witness testimony established a chain of property transfers: the plaintiff's husband purchased 2/4 share, subsequently transferred 3/4 share to Kumaresan, who then sold it to the plaintiff. The case involves disputes over property partition and the legality of construction on undivided property. Case adjourned for cross-examination of defendants 2-6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts