SRI NARAYANDAS, GOVINDADAS PRIVATE FAMILY TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE D.NARAYANBDAS vs MATHIYALAGAN Advocate - S.RAMKUMAR — 14/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR090000062022
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2022
Filing Date
03-01-2022
Registration No
14/2022
Registration Date
24-01-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Kulithalai
Judge
16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI NARAYANDAS, GOVINDADAS PRIVATE FAMILY TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE D.NARAYANBDAS
Adv. M.KHAJA MOHIDEEN, M.KAJAMOHIDEEN
Respondent(s)
MATHIYALAGAN Advocate - S.RAMKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The petition filed by the Defendant under Section 151 of CPC seeking permission to reopen the chief examination of witness DW3 for marking documents (rental receipts) omitted during the initial examination was allowed by the court. The court found that to render complete and fair justice, both parties must be given opportunities to prove their cases through documentary evidence, and the admissibility of documents should be decided at trial, not in an interim application. The Respondent (Plaintiff) retains full rights to cross-examine the witness and object to the documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition filed by the Defendant under Section 151 of CPC seeking permission to reopen the chief examination of witness DW3 for marking documents (rental receipts) omitted during the initial examination was allowed by the court. The court found that to render complete and fair justice, both parties must be given opportunities to prove their cases through documentary evidence, and the admissibility of documents should be decided at trial, not in an interim application. The Respondent (Plaintiff) retains full rights to cross-examine the witness and object to the documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts