K.AYISHA SITHIKA vs M.NAGARAJ AND 2 OTHERS — 383/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Orders Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR080010512022

Filing Number

1106/2022

Filing Date

19-Oct-2022

Registration No

383/2022

Registration Date

07-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Kulithalai

Judge

12-Sub Judge

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.AYISHA SITHIKA

    Adv. A.JAFFAR SHAT

  2. 2.K.MOHAMMED YASIN

  3. 3.K.SYED ABUTHAGIR

  4. 4.MINOR K.SIKKANTHARAMMA

  5. 5.MINOR K.JAINULABUDHIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.NAGARAJ AND 2 OTHERS

  2. 2.C.PALANISAMY

  3. 3.THE MANAGER,M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,KARUR

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  7. 16-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    Summary In this motor vehicle compensation case (MCOP.NO. 383/2022) heard on 16.09.2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding a vehicle with registration TN 01 AQ 5969 involved in an accident. The witness (respondent's side) testified that the vehicle's fitness certificate and driver's license were valid at the time of the accident, but the motor vehicle inspector's report did not mention these documents, and the insurance company contended it should not bear liability as the affected parties are third parties. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  10. 17-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  11. 08-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  12. 25-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  13. 30-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  14. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  15. 29-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  16. 03-Oct-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  17. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  18. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  19. 08-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  20. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  21. 06-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  22. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  23. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  24. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  25. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  26. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  27. 07-Mar-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  28. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  29. 02-Mar-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  30. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  31. 27-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge

  32. 09-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  33. 14-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  34. 10-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  35. 18-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  36. 09-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  37. 07-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 19-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 383/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this motor vehicle compensation case (MCOP.NO. 383/2022) heard on 16.09.2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding a vehicle with registration TN 01 AQ 5969 involved in an accident. The witness (respondent's side) testified that the vehicle's fitness certificate and driver's license were valid at the time of the accident, but the motor vehicle inspector's report did not mention these documents, and the insurance company contended it should not bear liability as the affected parties are third parties. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case