Hariharan vs Arav Associates and another — 326/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section sec 166. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKR080009092025

e-Filing Number

11-10-2025

Filing Number

887/2025

Filing Date

14-Oct-2025

Registration No

326/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Court

Sub Court, Kulithalai

Judge

12-Sub Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section sec 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hariharan

    Adv. KARTHIKEYAN R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arav Associates and another

  2. 2.Shriram Gen Ins Co Ltd

    Adv. A.NAGARAJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    The Lok Adalat (court) settled a motor accident compensation case where the claimant sought Rs. 30,00,000 in damages. The parties agreed to a settlement whereby the respondent insurance company agreed to pay Rs. 4,50,000 to the victim within 4 weeks via bank transfer, with 7.5% annual interest applicable if payment defaults. The award was passed without costs on the agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Counter

    Sub Judge

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 326/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat (court) settled a motor accident compensation case where the claimant sought Rs. 30,00,000 in damages. The parties agreed to a settlement whereby the respondent insurance company agreed to pay Rs. 4,50,000 to the victim within 4 weeks via bank transfer, with 7.5% annual interest applicable if payment defaults. The award was passed without costs on the agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case