A.SUSMITHA vs J.BENCY LOURDURAJ AND ONE ANOTHER — 310/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163,166. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080008082020
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
889/2020
Filing Date
18-11-2020
Registration No
310/2020
Registration Date
22-12-2020
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.SUSMITHA
Adv. R.KARTHIKEYAN
Respondent(s)
J.BENCY LOURDURAJ AND ONE ANOTHER
THE MANAGER,UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,KULITHALAI
Adv. A.NAAHARAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Await Reports
Evidence
Evidence
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 25-09-2025 | Await Reports | |
| 22-07-2025 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MCOP No. 310/2020 before the Subordinate Court in Cuddalore (dated 22.07.2025), the court recorded the testimony of the petitioner in a motor accident compensation case. The petitioner claimed responsibility for the accident, admitted fault, and sought compensation including medical bills (₹2,537). The court found the petitioner's evidence partially credible but noted inconsistencies regarding the accident location and the opposing vehicle's fitness certificate. The petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for compensation award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MCOP No. 310/2020 before the Subordinate Court in Cuddalore (dated 22.07.2025), the court recorded the testimony of the petitioner in a motor accident compensation case. The petitioner claimed responsibility for the accident, admitted fault, and sought compensation including medical bills (₹2,537). The court found the petitioner's evidence partially credible but noted inconsistencies regarding the accident location and the opposing vehicle's fitness certificate. The petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for compensation award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts