THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAYANOOR POLICE STATION vs J.RAJKUMAR AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - T.AZHARUDEEN — 15/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),307,r/w,34. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKR080007702022

Filing Number

15/2022

Filing Date

27-Jul-2022

Registration No

15/2022

Registration Date

27-Jul-2022

Court

Sub Court, Kulithalai

Judge

12-Sub Judge

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

505

Police Station

Mayanur P.S

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),307,r/w,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAYANOOR POLICE STATION

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J.RAJKUMAR AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - T.AZHARUDEEN

  2. 2.R.VIMALRAJ

    Adv. T.AZHARUDEEN

  3. 3.M.MANIKANDAN

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Sub Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Sub Judge

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  6. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  7. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  8. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  10. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  11. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  12. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  13. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  14. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  15. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  16. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  17. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  18. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  19. 19-Jul-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

  20. 19-Jul-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF

    This document is a deposition of a witness (not a final court order) in Miscellaneous Case No. S.C. 15/2022 before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kulithalai. The witness, Santhoshkumar (son of Palanisamy), testified on 19.07.2024 regarding an alleged assault with a sickle by accused Rajkumar on 27.09.2020, during which the witness suffered a neck injury. The witness identified the weapon (sickle) used in the attack and provided a detailed account of the incident to police. This is a procedural recording of witness testimony under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code, not a final judgment on the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  22. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  23. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  24. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  25. 20-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  26. 05-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  27. 10-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  28. 14-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  29. 09-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  30. 11-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge

  31. 06-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge

  32. 06-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge

  33. 19-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge

  34. 01-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge

  35. 18-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge

  36. 18-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge

  37. 05-Aug-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Sub Judge

  38. 01-Aug-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Sub Judge

  39. 29-Jul-2022

    Framing of Charges

    Sub Judge

  40. 27-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 27-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a deposition of a witness (not a final court order) in Miscellaneous Case No. S.C. 15/2022 before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kulithalai. The witness, Santhoshkumar (son of Palanisamy), testified on 19.07.2024 regarding an alleged assault with a sickle by accused Rajkumar on 27.09.2020, during which the witness suffered a neck injury. The witness identified the weapon (sickle) used in the attack and provided a detailed account of the incident to police. This is a procedural recording of witness testimony under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code, not a final judgment on the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case