THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAYANOOR POLICE STATION vs J.RAJKUMAR AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - T.AZHARUDEEN — 15/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),307,r/w,34. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKR080007702022
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2022
Filing Date
27-07-2022
Registration No
15/2022
Registration Date
27-07-2022
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
505
Police Station
Mayanur P.S
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAYANOOR POLICE STATION
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
J.RAJKUMAR AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - T.AZHARUDEEN
R.VIMALRAJ
Adv. T.AZHARUDEEN
M.MANIKANDAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Part Heard
Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of a witness (not a final court order) in Miscellaneous Case No. S.C. 15/2022 before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kulithalai. The witness, Santhoshkumar (son of Palanisamy), testified on 19.07.2024 regarding an alleged assault with a sickle by accused Rajkumar on 27.09.2020, during which the witness suffered a neck injury. The witness identified the weapon (sickle) used in the attack and provided a detailed account of the incident to police. This is a procedural recording of witness testimony under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code, not a final judgment on the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of a witness (not a final court order) in Miscellaneous Case No. S.C. 15/2022 before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kulithalai. The witness, Santhoshkumar (son of Palanisamy), testified on 19.07.2024 regarding an alleged assault with a sickle by accused Rajkumar on 27.09.2020, during which the witness suffered a neck injury. The witness identified the weapon (sickle) used in the attack and provided a detailed account of the incident to police. This is a procedural recording of witness testimony under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code, not a final judgment on the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts