C.ESWARAN vs T.NAGAMANI AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - K MARIAYAPPAN — 255/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR080007532022
Filing Number
801/2022
Filing Date
25-Jul-2022
Registration No
255/2022
Registration Date
06-Aug-2022
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C.ESWARAN
Adv. R.KRISHNASAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.T.NAGAMANI AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - K MARIAYAPPAN
-
2.T.THANGARAJAN
Adv. K.MARIAPPAN
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: OS.No. 255/2022, Subordinate Court, Cuddalore Date: 04.03.2026 The court completed cross-examination of the plaintiff (Eswaran) regarding a disputed property deed (Exhibit A.1). The plaintiff admitted to drafting the document based on defendants' instructions, purchasing revenue stamps, and that witnesses signed at the defendants' behest. The plaintiff acknowledged potential defects in the deed's authenticity and claimed he followed the defendants' directions. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony and noted that the cross-examination of the plaintiff has concluded without further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
17-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
11-Aug-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence / DepositionView PDF
-
02-Jun-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Trial
Sub Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Issues
Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Mediation
Sub Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Mediation
Sub Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Feb-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
19-Feb-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Nov-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
27-Sep-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
07-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
09-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
27-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
01-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
06-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
26-Oct-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
06-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 255/2022
Court Order Summary Case: OS.No. 255/2022, Subordinate Court, Cuddalore Date: 04.03.2026 The court completed cross-examination of the plaintiff (Eswaran) regarding a disputed property deed (Exhibit A.1). The plaintiff admitted to drafting the document based on defendants' instructions, purchasing revenue stamps, and that witnesses signed at the defendants' behest. The plaintiff acknowledged potential defects in the deed's authenticity and claimed he followed the defendants' directions. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony and noted that the cross-examination of the plaintiff has concluded without further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts