C.ESWARAN vs T.NAGAMANI AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - K MARIAYAPPAN — 255/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR080007532022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
801/2022
Filing Date
25-07-2022
Registration No
255/2022
Registration Date
06-08-2022
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.ESWARAN
Adv. R.KRISHNASAMY
Respondent(s)
T.NAGAMANI AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - K MARIAYAPPAN
T.THANGARAJAN
Adv. K.MARIAPPAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: OS.No. 255/2022, Subordinate Court, Cuddalore Date: 04.03.2026 The court completed cross-examination of the plaintiff (Eswaran) regarding a disputed property deed (Exhibit A.1). The plaintiff admitted to drafting the document based on defendants' instructions, purchasing revenue stamps, and that witnesses signed at the defendants' behest. The plaintiff acknowledged potential defects in the deed's authenticity and claimed he followed the defendants' directions. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony and noted that the cross-examination of the plaintiff has concluded without further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: OS.No. 255/2022, Subordinate Court, Cuddalore Date: 04.03.2026 The court completed cross-examination of the plaintiff (Eswaran) regarding a disputed property deed (Exhibit A.1). The plaintiff admitted to drafting the document based on defendants' instructions, purchasing revenue stamps, and that witnesses signed at the defendants' behest. The plaintiff acknowledged potential defects in the deed's authenticity and claimed he followed the defendants' directions. The court recorded the plaintiff's testimony and noted that the cross-examination of the plaintiff has concluded without further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts