S.NALINI AND ONE ANOTHER vs T.NAGAMANI AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - MARIAPPAN — 256/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR080007522022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
800/2022
Filing Date
25-07-2022
Registration No
256/2022
Registration Date
06-08-2022
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.NALINI AND ONE ANOTHER
Adv. R.KRISHNASAMY
C.ESWARAN
Adv. R.KRISHNASAMY
Respondent(s)
T.NAGAMANI AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - MARIAPPAN
T.THANGARAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: OS No. 256/2022, Cuddalore Subordinate Court, dated 17.03.2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed document (Exhibit A.1) allegedly executed by defendants. After cross-examination, the court found discrepancies in the document's authenticity and circumstances of execution. The court held that Exhibit A.1 lacks credibility and that defendants failed to prove their claims. The suit is dismissed, and defendants are directed to pay Rs. 1,90,000 to plaintiff as per documentary evidence in Exhibit 129/1 relating to an earlier settlement obligation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: OS No. 256/2022, Cuddalore Subordinate Court, dated 17.03.2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a disputed document (Exhibit A.1) allegedly executed by defendants. After cross-examination, the court found discrepancies in the document's authenticity and circumstances of execution. The court held that Exhibit A.1 lacks credibility and that defendants failed to prove their claims. The suit is dismissed, and defendants are directed to pay Rs. 1,90,000 to plaintiff as per documentary evidence in Exhibit 129/1 relating to an earlier settlement obligation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts