SRI SABTHARISHI RESEARCH AND MEDICAL FOUNDATION BY MANAGING TRUSTEE DR.S.S.MANIKANDAN vs SRI GURU VIDHAYA PEEDAM TRUST BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE N.S.RAJAGOPAL AND TWO OTHERS — 1200097/2017
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 614. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR080006992017
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1200097/2017
Filing Date
13-07-2017
Registration No
1200097/2017
Registration Date
13-07-2017
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI SABTHARISHI RESEARCH AND MEDICAL FOUNDATION BY MANAGING TRUSTEE DR.S.S.MANIKANDAN
Adv. P.NAGESWARAN
Respondent(s)
SRI GURU VIDHAYA PEEDAM TRUST BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE N.S.RAJAGOPAL AND TWO OTHERS
SRI GURU VIDHAYA PEEDAM TRUST BY ITS CORRESPONDANT S.DHANALAKSHMI
Adv. A.KANAGASABAI
M.ROSHAN MANAVALAN
Adv. SIVASANKARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
The interim application (IA No.15/2026 in OS No.97/2017) filed before the Kulithalai Court on 20.04.2026 has been allowed/permitted. The court found the petitioner's reasons credible and acceptable, and determined that granting the petition would not cause any loss to the respondents. No costs have been imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The interim application (IA No.15/2026 in OS No.97/2017) filed before the Kulithalai Court on 20.04.2026 has been allowed/permitted. The court found the petitioner's reasons credible and acceptable, and determined that granting the petition would not cause any loss to the respondents. No costs have been imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts