P.YOGANATHAN vs K.VASU AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - EXPARTE — 225/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Mediation on 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKR080006892022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
736/2022
Filing Date
06-07-2022
Registration No
225/2022
Registration Date
06-07-2022
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Mediation
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.YOGANATHAN
Adv. S.SUDHAKAR
Respondent(s)
K.VASU AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - EXPARTE
V.KARTHICK
Adv. EXPARTE
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Disposed
Appearance
Await Reports
Mediation
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 02-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 04-02-2026 | Mediation | |
| 15-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The Kulithalai Sub-Court dismissed the applicants' petition to set aside a ex-parte order dated 11.10.2022 against them in an original suit concerning a loan dispute and property attachment. The court found that while the applicants' father's health emergency warranted consideration, insufficient evidence was provided to support their claims, and allowing the petition would not prejudice the respondent. However, the court granted the applicants an opportunity to contest the main suit, imposing a cost of ₹500 to be paid to the respondent by 03.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Kulithalai Sub-Court dismissed the applicants' petition to set aside a ex-parte order dated 11.10.2022 against them in an original suit concerning a loan dispute and property attachment. The court found that while the applicants' father's health emergency warranted consideration, insufficient evidence was provided to support their claims, and allowing the petition would not prejudice the respondent. However, the court granted the applicants an opportunity to contest the main suit, imposing a cost of ₹500 to be paid to the respondent by 03.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts