SRI GURU VIDHYA PEEDAM, REP BY ITS TRUSTEE TMT. S.DHANALAKSHMI vs SRI GURU VIDHYA PEEDAM, REP BY ITS TRUSTEE TMT. N.S.RAJAGOPALAN AND ONE OTHER — 1200013/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section ORDER41RULE1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNKR080006182018
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1200587/2018
Filing Date
24-04-2018
Registration No
1200013/2018
Registration Date
24-04-2018
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI GURU VIDHYA PEEDAM, REP BY ITS TRUSTEE TMT. S.DHANALAKSHMI
Adv. B.MALARKANNAN
Respondent(s)
SRI GURU VIDHYA PEEDAM, REP BY ITS TRUSTEE TMT. N.S.RAJAGOPALAN AND ONE OTHER
M/S. SABTHARISHI RESEARCH AND MIDICAL FOUNDATION REP. BY DR.S.S.MANIKANDHAN (DIED)
Adv. V.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
M/S. SABTHARISHI RESEARCH AND MIDICAL FOUNDATION REP. BY ITS SECRETARY K.SUNDARAJAN
Adv. B.MALARKANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: Appeal Suit No. 13/2018 was dismissed for default on October 17, 2023, by the Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai. The appellant, Sri Guru Vidhya Peedam Trust, failed to present arguments despite being given sufficient opportunity, and the first respondent was absent. The appeal challenging the 2018 lower court decree regarding the validity of disputed lease deeds was accordingly dismissed as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Appeal Suit No. 13/2018 was dismissed for default on October 17, 2023, by the Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai. The appellant, Sri Guru Vidhya Peedam Trust, failed to present arguments despite being given sufficient opportunity, and the first respondent was absent. The appeal challenging the 2018 lower court decree regarding the validity of disputed lease deeds was accordingly dismissed as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts