M.KUPPUSAMY AND OTHERS vs S.MARUTHAMUTHU AND ONE OTHER — 1200334/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Disposed: Uncontested--Returned on 10th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKR080005712018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1200542/2018
Filing Date
12-07-2018
Registration No
1200334/2018
Registration Date
12-07-2018
Court
Sub Court, Kulithalai
Judge
12-Sub Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Returned
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.KUPPUSAMY AND OTHERS
Adv. A.B.MEENASHISUNDARAM
K. KALIESWARI
Adv. A.B.MEENASHISUNDARAMA
Respondent(s)
S.MARUTHAMUTHU AND ONE OTHER
THE MANAGER, UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITTED,CHENNAI
Adv. A.NAGARAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sub Judge
Disposed
Orders
For further Proceedings
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-02-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 11-12-2025 | Enquiry | |
| 18-09-2025 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Kulithalai Sub Judge Court rejected a motor vehicle compensation claim (₹30 lakhs) for lack of territorial jurisdiction. The court found that the claimants failed to provide proper residential proof (government identity cards or sworn affidavits) to establish residence within the court's jurisdiction as required under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166(2). The application was returned to be refiled before the appropriate tribunal within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Kulithalai Sub Judge Court rejected a motor vehicle compensation claim (₹30 lakhs) for lack of territorial jurisdiction. The court found that the claimants failed to provide proper residential proof (government identity cards or sworn affidavits) to establish residence within the court's jurisdiction as required under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166(2). The application was returned to be refiled before the appropriate tribunal within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts